Tuesday 5 May 2009

Ok, so you've got 70 nukes...

...and you're gonna let as many roar as you need to cause maximum damage to the non-fundamentalist Islamic world as possible, without mercy. Nowhere is safe. You're doing it for the Faith as a whole and for the long term so symbolic hits would be a waste.

The attack would be followed up by coordinated personnel movements to take over societies throwing much of the planet into a Sharia dark age. You'd need to demolish military resistance by at least 75%.

The nukes aren't missile-borne. They were shipped, or driven, or flown, or planted.

Who goes?.

21 comments:

  1. I think END The States, and China.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would let of all 70 in Ballarat, that place gives me the shits.

    May give my relos there the heads up first though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. OK the US is going to take at least 15. 10 on home soil and another 5 for big offshore bases
    The UK four or five.
    Mother Russia - 4 would probably do it.
    India would need at least 3.
    France, Germany Spain, Brussels 1 each.
    China is a problem, you want to destabilise the central authority to the point where there would be no retaliation, but you could feasibly use all 70 on China, so the target value / cost ratio starts to kick in. Perhaps 10.
    Isreal gets at least 2 just on principle.
    Maybe one for South Africa.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What would it take for the yanks to pool their military resources in 'one area'. Say, around continental USA. An invasion?. Would nukes do it?. Or would that keep a significant % away?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am fascinated by the idea.

    "non-fundamentalist Islamic world as possible"

    I guess I am not sure which bits of the world are my target options.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AHHH, OK, nearly missed the wole context..I'm a turban wearin, camel driving, dupont exploding suit wearing NUT JOB...Now I am with ya. I'll be back

    ReplyDelete
  7. The most violent attacks are "saved" for other believers, Shia and Sunni and so on, So to that end we'll probably see a molten slag heap around the middle east - with only a couple sent to America and Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Can't see 70 being nearly enough. Just picking off the top 70 metropolitan population regions - none of which are under fundy Islam control or reasonably likely to be (other than Lahore and Karachi which are still nominally moderate at the mo) - leaves anything Singapore or Sydney sized still standing. Apols for the spontaneous alliteration.
    http://www.citypopulation.de/world/Agglomerations.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. We've got up to 200 nukes. Twas thinking around the 70 mark for 'realism purposes'.

    http://www.wmdinsights.com/I5/R4_RussiaandUkranian.htm

    Barnes, whatever gets the job done.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's for the FAITH not the people. Maybe a billion Muslims need to go as well. What would get a Fundi global regime?.

    Probably there would be enclaves of resistance.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There was this crappy little town in Canada I passed through once. Edmonston (NB), (not Edmonton, BC). Light off all the nukes you've got in that fucking hole.

    ReplyDelete
  12. fuck the whiny aussies..twice with nukes..
    the sheep screwers next door..they're harmless ;)

    You can't get a nuke into Alaska..unless your well connected.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Okay... Assuming 100-150 kt mirvs yes?

    UK:
    City of London
    Trafalgar square
    Manchester city centre
    liverpool
    birmingham town centre (bye bye new Bullring!)
    Portsmouth
    Glasgow
    bristol
    newcastle upon tyne.
    Edinburg
    Aberdeen

    france
    Paris (one at the tour d'eiffil the other unde the arc du triumph)
    Nantes
    Toulouse
    Marseille

    Germany:
    Hamburg (by the docks)
    Berlin
    Frankfurt
    Leipzig

    Spain:
    Madrid
    Barcelona

    italy:
    naples
    Roma
    Venice
    turin
    Milan

    Greece
    Athens (not that anyone will notice the differance)

    Poland
    warsaw
    gdansk

    Eire, sweden, norway, denmark, Austria, Czech republic,serbia, hungary, romania, bulgaria get one each at their capitals.

    Turkey: just one in ankarra

    india:
    Delhi, Goa, mumbai

    iran (assuming these are sunni's we're talking about)
    Tehran, Qom

    Russia
    moscow (two nukes)
    St Petersburg
    Murmansk
    Vladivostock
    Novosibirsk
    Tula

    The USA
    Washington (goes without saying)
    Norfolk
    Denver
    Seattle
    Bangor
    Galvaston
    Chicago
    LA
    SF
    San Diego
    Honolulu
    Philli
    Ft's Bragg, Mead, Dietrich
    Langley
    NY

    S America
    Caracas
    Rio
    BA
    Santiago
    Bogota
    Lima

    latin america
    Just mexico city and panama city


    Japan:
    Tokyo
    yokohama
    Okinawa
    Osaka

    Korea:
    Soeul
    Pusan

    Odd asian cities:
    Singapore
    Hanoi
    Bangkok
    Cam ranh bay

    The PRC:
    Beijing two nukes
    Sanghai two nukes
    Hong Kong
    nanjing
    Fuzhou
    Chengdu
    Guangzhou
    Hangzhou
    Tianjin

    Australia
    Sydney
    Melbourne
    Townsville
    Perth
    Darwin

    Specfic sites
    Mons
    brussels
    Strasbourg
    Guam
    Diego Garcia


    With less than 100 devices i've pretty much taken out most of the worlds leadership. the only risk comes from the boomers of the US,french, and british navies oh and russia's land based ICBM's (but don't be too certain about the latter).

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good man. I'll have to map em out.

    Ak ~ there's no reason they couldn't have come by complicit airlines and detonated over cities.

    ReplyDelete
  15. There was an interesting study that showed if you used a spread of 10 20 kts nukes you get a much better effect than one big 200Kt jobbie.

    Just thought

    a couple of new targets

    Dallas/Ft Worth airport
    Tampa airbase

    ReplyDelete
  16. Military and gov would be top of the list.

    ReplyDelete
  17. with my pattern spread you've lost most of the USA oversea naval bases.

    Europe/Russia is headless and most of the PRC's major ports are screwed as well. major Equity markets are gone oh and I've taken the heads off the main non-opec oil gas produicers as well.

    I've also been thinking as to who the boomers would launch against russia? china? as they would assume a decapitation strike of some sort

    ReplyDelete
  18. An alliance with China instead of knocking them over?. That would give them Asia through to Africa straight up.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Normally i'd say yes, but this sort of thing is likely to hurt the PRC and lets not forget that Beijing is allegedly trying to put down an rebellion by the Uighers which has the backing of AQ.

    If you're planning to reinstall the caliphate then you want ALL the major players in the world hurting and off balance.

    ReplyDelete
  20. and Chaz, reckons he i a busy man..HA!
    pretty good strike Chaz has.

    I'd toss one a Tampa Florida as well
    Odessa to for that matter
    Cool double checked he's already got Portsmouth on the list .

    I'd also ZAP, deigo and Guam as well , yep he has Osaka Good.

    OH..panama Canal as well and keil too

    ReplyDelete

Please leave your name/handle with your comment. It's important to stand next to our thoughts.