...and you're gonna let as many roar as you need to cause maximum damage to the non-fundamentalist Islamic world as possible, without mercy. Nowhere is safe. You're doing it for the Faith as a whole and for the long term so symbolic hits would be a waste.
The attack would be followed up by coordinated personnel movements to take over societies throwing much of the planet into a Sharia dark age. You'd need to demolish military resistance by at least 75%.
The nukes aren't missile-borne. They were shipped, or driven, or flown, or planted.
Who goes?.
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think END The States, and China.
ReplyDeleteI would let of all 70 in Ballarat, that place gives me the shits.
ReplyDeleteMay give my relos there the heads up first though.
OK the US is going to take at least 15. 10 on home soil and another 5 for big offshore bases
ReplyDeleteThe UK four or five.
Mother Russia - 4 would probably do it.
India would need at least 3.
France, Germany Spain, Brussels 1 each.
China is a problem, you want to destabilise the central authority to the point where there would be no retaliation, but you could feasibly use all 70 on China, so the target value / cost ratio starts to kick in. Perhaps 10.
Isreal gets at least 2 just on principle.
Maybe one for South Africa.
What would it take for the yanks to pool their military resources in 'one area'. Say, around continental USA. An invasion?. Would nukes do it?. Or would that keep a significant % away?
ReplyDeleteI am fascinated by the idea.
ReplyDelete"non-fundamentalist Islamic world as possible"
I guess I am not sure which bits of the world are my target options.
AHHH, OK, nearly missed the wole context..I'm a turban wearin, camel driving, dupont exploding suit wearing NUT JOB...Now I am with ya. I'll be back
ReplyDeleteThe most violent attacks are "saved" for other believers, Shia and Sunni and so on, So to that end we'll probably see a molten slag heap around the middle east - with only a couple sent to America and Europe.
ReplyDeleteCan't see 70 being nearly enough. Just picking off the top 70 metropolitan population regions - none of which are under fundy Islam control or reasonably likely to be (other than Lahore and Karachi which are still nominally moderate at the mo) - leaves anything Singapore or Sydney sized still standing. Apols for the spontaneous alliteration.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.citypopulation.de/world/Agglomerations.html
We've got up to 200 nukes. Twas thinking around the 70 mark for 'realism purposes'.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wmdinsights.com/I5/R4_RussiaandUkranian.htm
Barnes, whatever gets the job done.
It's for the FAITH not the people. Maybe a billion Muslims need to go as well. What would get a Fundi global regime?.
ReplyDeleteProbably there would be enclaves of resistance.
There was this crappy little town in Canada I passed through once. Edmonston (NB), (not Edmonton, BC). Light off all the nukes you've got in that fucking hole.
ReplyDeletefuck the whiny aussies..twice with nukes..
ReplyDeletethe sheep screwers next door..they're harmless ;)
You can't get a nuke into Alaska..unless your well connected.
Okay... Assuming 100-150 kt mirvs yes?
ReplyDeleteUK:
City of London
Trafalgar square
Manchester city centre
liverpool
birmingham town centre (bye bye new Bullring!)
Portsmouth
Glasgow
bristol
newcastle upon tyne.
Edinburg
Aberdeen
france
Paris (one at the tour d'eiffil the other unde the arc du triumph)
Nantes
Toulouse
Marseille
Germany:
Hamburg (by the docks)
Berlin
Frankfurt
Leipzig
Spain:
Madrid
Barcelona
italy:
naples
Roma
Venice
turin
Milan
Greece
Athens (not that anyone will notice the differance)
Poland
warsaw
gdansk
Eire, sweden, norway, denmark, Austria, Czech republic,serbia, hungary, romania, bulgaria get one each at their capitals.
Turkey: just one in ankarra
india:
Delhi, Goa, mumbai
iran (assuming these are sunni's we're talking about)
Tehran, Qom
Russia
moscow (two nukes)
St Petersburg
Murmansk
Vladivostock
Novosibirsk
Tula
The USA
Washington (goes without saying)
Norfolk
Denver
Seattle
Bangor
Galvaston
Chicago
LA
SF
San Diego
Honolulu
Philli
Ft's Bragg, Mead, Dietrich
Langley
NY
S America
Caracas
Rio
BA
Santiago
Bogota
Lima
latin america
Just mexico city and panama city
Japan:
Tokyo
yokohama
Okinawa
Osaka
Korea:
Soeul
Pusan
Odd asian cities:
Singapore
Hanoi
Bangkok
Cam ranh bay
The PRC:
Beijing two nukes
Sanghai two nukes
Hong Kong
nanjing
Fuzhou
Chengdu
Guangzhou
Hangzhou
Tianjin
Australia
Sydney
Melbourne
Townsville
Perth
Darwin
Specfic sites
Mons
brussels
Strasbourg
Guam
Diego Garcia
With less than 100 devices i've pretty much taken out most of the worlds leadership. the only risk comes from the boomers of the US,french, and british navies oh and russia's land based ICBM's (but don't be too certain about the latter).
Good man. I'll have to map em out.
ReplyDeleteAk ~ there's no reason they couldn't have come by complicit airlines and detonated over cities.
There was an interesting study that showed if you used a spread of 10 20 kts nukes you get a much better effect than one big 200Kt jobbie.
ReplyDeleteJust thought
a couple of new targets
Dallas/Ft Worth airport
Tampa airbase
Military and gov would be top of the list.
ReplyDeletewith my pattern spread you've lost most of the USA oversea naval bases.
ReplyDeleteEurope/Russia is headless and most of the PRC's major ports are screwed as well. major Equity markets are gone oh and I've taken the heads off the main non-opec oil gas produicers as well.
I've also been thinking as to who the boomers would launch against russia? china? as they would assume a decapitation strike of some sort
An alliance with China instead of knocking them over?. That would give them Asia through to Africa straight up.
ReplyDeleteNormally i'd say yes, but this sort of thing is likely to hurt the PRC and lets not forget that Beijing is allegedly trying to put down an rebellion by the Uighers which has the backing of AQ.
ReplyDeleteIf you're planning to reinstall the caliphate then you want ALL the major players in the world hurting and off balance.
BOOM it is.
ReplyDeleteand Chaz, reckons he i a busy man..HA!
ReplyDeletepretty good strike Chaz has.
I'd toss one a Tampa Florida as well
Odessa to for that matter
Cool double checked he's already got Portsmouth on the list .
I'd also ZAP, deigo and Guam as well , yep he has Osaka Good.
OH..panama Canal as well and keil too